In Re Friday
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
After hearings pursuant to our rule on disciplinary procedure, the Board of Commissioners of Grievances and Discipline filed with this Court its certified report finding the respondent guilty of professional misconduct, and recommending that the respondent be publicly reprimanded. The matter is now before us on the report of the Board and the respondent’s return to our order requiring him to show cause why a disciplinary order should not be issued against him.
Respondent is a member of the Bar of South Carolina and has been engaged in the practice of law in this state since 1949. For quite a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
3Cited by13 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Anonymous v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Council on Probate Judicial Conduct re: KinsellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In Re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.