Burns v. Clayton
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
After hearings pursuant to our Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed with this court its final certified report finding each of the respondents guilty of professional misconduct and recommending that the respondents Clayton and Tison be permanently disbarred and the respondent Wannamaker publicly reprimanded. The matter is now before us on that report and the respondents’ returns to our orders requiring them to show cause, respectively, why the report of the Board should not be confirmed and disciplinary orders issued accordingly.
Responde…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- In Re WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. SouthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- State v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- American Civil Liberties Union and Jane Koe v. O. Harry Bozardt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.