In Re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of Palmer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
The first question for our consideration is whether Judge Snepp’s order is reviewable by the appellate division. We hold that it is.
In holding that this cause is not reviewable at the behest of the state, the Court of Appeals relied upon the decision of this Court in In re Stiers, 204 N.C. 48, 167 S.E. 382 (1933), a case involving suspension of an attorney’s privilege to practice law. There, an attorney who had entered a plea of nolo contendere in the United States District Court to a felony charge was suspended from practicing law in that court during a period of probation. On…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Association v. EdwinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- North Carolina State Bar v. TalfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- The NC State Bar v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.