Legal Opinion

Metge v. Central Neighborhood Improvement Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 2002No. C2-02-249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge.

Appellant sued respondent for defamation and tortious interference with contract based upon respondent’s statements and actions that allegedly led to a neighborhood organization’s termination of appellant’s at-will employment. On appeal from summary judgment dismissing her claims, appellant argues that the district court erred in concluding (1) that the alleged defamatory statements were mere opinion and not defamatory, or were not made with malice, and (2) that the actions alleged to constitute tortious interference with contract were not shown to have caused the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  2. Wilson v. Daily Gazette Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cenveo Corp. v. Southern Graphic Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. Flora v. Firepond, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  5. Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API