Legal Opinion
Cenveo Corp. v. Southern Graphic Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 25, 2011No. Civil 08-5521 (JRT/AJB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
This case arises from Southern Graphic Systems, Inc.’s (“SGS”) hiring of Mike Austin, Shawn Austin, Tom Austin, Paul Pederson, Emily Ryan, and Susan Spears (“individual defendants” and collectively with SGS, “defendants”). Plaintiff Cenveo Corporation (“Cenveo”) had employed the individual defendants immediately prior to their employment at SGS. Cenveo alleges the defendants violated a duty of loyalty, interfered with clients, interfered with employment contracts, committed fraud, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cpi Card Grp., Inc. v. John Dwyer, Multi Packaging Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Qwest Communications Co. v. Free Conferencing Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Sorin Group USA, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.