Legal Opinion

Samms v. District Court, Fourth Judicial District of the State of Colorado

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1995No. 95SA22PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum

The petitioners, Judy Anne Samms (hereafter referred to as “Samms”) and her husband, Frank Clifford Samms, have initiated this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21. The petitioners seek relief from an order entered by the respondent, the District Court for the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Colorado (the trial court), which *523order authorized the attorney representing Dr. Michael Bjork, the defendant in a medical malpractice action filed by the petitioners, to conduct ex parte interviews with several physicians who had treated Samms. Having issued a rule to show cause why the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  4. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. ALEXANDER v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HeerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Weil v. Dillon Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Gadeco, LLC v. GrynbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. Acierno Ex Rel. Acierno v. GaryfallouColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. In re Bailey v. HermacinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API