Legal Opinion
In re Bailey v. Hermacinski
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 5, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 17SA20PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.
*159 ¶ 1 In this original proceeding, we consider the scope of the physician-patient privilege in a medical-malpractice action. Section 13-90-107(1)(d), C.R.S. (2017), prohibits certain medical providers from revealing, in testimony or otherwise, information about a patient gathered in the course of treating that patient. That prohibition, however, is not unlimited. Section 13-90-107(1)(d)(I), for instance, states that when a patient sues their medical provider, information "arising out of or connected with" that provider's treatment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Alcon v. SpicerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Cardenas v. JerathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Warden v. Exempla, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Ortega v. Colorado Permanente Medical GroupSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity National Title Co. v. First American Title Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gadeco, LLC v. GrynbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- In Re Jina Garcia, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Centura Health CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2025
- Duran v. CorenmanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021