Legal Opinion
Gadeco, LLC v. Grynberg
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 9, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 17SA247PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 In this original proceeding, we consider whether the defendant Jack Grynberg impliedly waived the physician-patient privilege by either (1) requesting specific performance of a contract, or (2) denying the plaintiffs' allegations that he made irrational decisions. Grynberg asserted counterclaims for breach of contract against the plaintiffs, his children and former wife ("the Family"). Grynberg's counterclaims requested the specific performance of an oral or implied-in-fact contract in which the Family allegedly agreed to allow…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Alcon v. SpicerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Co. v. McCloughanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Johnson v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zapata v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- In Re Lucas Trenshaw and Theresa Gardner, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Timothy Trenshaw v. Eugene Jennings and All State Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2025
- People v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- v LFI Fort PierceColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Carlson v. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.