Legal Opinion
Maynard v. Heeren
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] David, Cathy and Jon Maynard (Maynards) filed an intermediate appeal from the circuit court’s discovery order requiring them to provide Raymond Heeren (Heeren) with all psychotherapy records of Cathy Maynard.1 We affirm with instruction.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] David and Cathy Maynard are the parents of an autistic son, Jon. Heeren allegedly is the leader of a taxpayer group opposed to the expense generated by the Greater Hoyt School District’s special education placement of Jon. The Maynards claim that Heeren made false statements about them to Union…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.