Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendant Eli Lilly & Company, Inc., (“Lilly”) a pharmaceuticals manufacturer, to compel discovery—more precisely, to facilitate it—namely, to require plaintiffs to execute appropriate written forms addressed to their various physicians authorizing them to release to defendant’s attorneys such information about them as the physicians may have acquired in a privileged capacity. For the reasons hereafter stated defendant’s motion will be granted.
Plaintiffs Mary and Scott Doe, mother and child, allege…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.