Legal Opinion

Crescent Hat Co. v. Chizik

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WiNBORNE, I.

The validity of the judgment obtained by plaintiff

against defendant in the New York court, and sued on in this action, is not controverted by defendant. Therefore, under Article IV, section 1, of the Constitution of the United States the judgment when properly authenticated is entitled in the courts of this State to be given full faith and credit. However, in challenging a foreign judgment “defendant has a right to interpose proper defenses; he may defeat recovery by proof of any fraud practiced in obtaining the judgment which may have prevented him from having an adverse trial of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobowitz v. HersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Mottu v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Mottu v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guinness Plc Guinness America, Incorporated v. Thomas Joseph Ward, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Thomas v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API