Legal Opinion

Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. . Coble

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

At common law one of the methods of confessing judgment was by means of a written authority directed to one or more attorneys to appear for the party executing it and to receive a declaration for him in an action at the suit of a person named therein, and thereupon to confess the same or to suffer judgment to pass by default. The writing was known as a warrant of attorney. As a rule it was given as security for the obligation upon which judgment was authorized, and the service of process was not essential. Cuykendall v. Doe, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.), 449. The practice is now recognized in some of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Priest v. Trustees of Town of Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Crescent Hat Co. v. ChizikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. In Re OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Liberty National Bank v. VanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API