Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. . Coble
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
At common law one of the methods of confessing judgment was by means of a written authority directed to one or more attorneys to appear for the party executing it and to receive a declaration for him in an action at the suit of a person named therein, and thereupon to confess the same or to suffer judgment to pass by default. The writing was known as a warrant of attorney. As a rule it was given as security for the obligation upon which judgment was authorized, and the service of process was not essential. Cuykendall v. Doe, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.), 449. The practice is now recognized in some of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Priest v. Trustees of Town of Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Crescent Hat Co. v. ChizikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- In Re OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Liberty National Bank v. VanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.