Legal Opinion
McRary v. McRary
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 7, 1948PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarNhill, J.
G-. S. 47-18 protects only creditors and purchasers for value. Plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that in fact there was no consideration paid for the deed from McEary and wife to Vines and wife. Hence, if she otherwise has a good cause of action, she is entitled to a jury trial on this issue. .
Did the court below, by entering a judgment of nonsuit, fail to accord full faith and credit to a judgment of a court of a sister state in viola- • tion of the provisions of Art. IV, sec. 1, of the United States Constitution % The answer is no.
The full' faith and credit clause has never been…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Whitehead v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.