Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 4, 1966No. 362PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Article IY, section 1, of the Constitution of the United States commands that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the judicial proceedings of every other state. And the acts of Congress, enacted pursuant to the power granted by that clause of the Constitution, direct that judgments shall have full faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from which they are taken. Dansby v. Insurance Co., 209 N.C. 127, 183 S.E. 521. Judgments of other states are put on the same footing as domestic…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Byham v. National Cibo House CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Thrasher v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Willard Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- A & S Distributing Co. v. Providence Pile Fabric Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.