Legal Opinion

In re: Eric Alexander Farris

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 2015No. SC94418PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul C. Wilson, Judge

The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel (“OCDC”) filed an Information in two counts charging Respondent Eric Farris (“Farris”) with various violations of the Rules of Professional' Responsibility (the “Rules”),1 The Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Missouri appointed a disciplinary hearing panel (the “DHP”) to hear the case. Following a hearing, the DHP found that Farris committed numerous instances of misconduct under the Rules, including misappropriation of client funds, and recommended that Farris be suspended indefinitely with no leave to apply for reinstatement for six months.

B…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Matter of ConnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NwadikeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Matter of MendellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. In Re BelzSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re: R. Scott GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. In re McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. In re: Ambry Nichole Schuessler, consolidated with In re: Katherine Anne DierdorfSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  4. In re: Joel B. EisensteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. In re: Dan K. PurdySupreme Court of Missouri · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API