Legal Opinion

Shields v. William Freihofer Baking Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1941No. Appeal, 320PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The only question raised in this appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is whether'Wilfred Shields, the claimant, was an employe of the defendant baking company at the time he was injured, or an independent contractor.

The referee in his sixth finding of fact found that the. claimant was an employe, of the defendant and the board affirmed this finding. Exceptions filed thereto were sustained by the court of common pleas, which held that there was no evidence to support the board’s finding. The claimant appealed.

There is no dispute as to the accident or to the extent of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Healey v. Carey, Baxter & Kennedy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Schwartz v. Laundry & Linen Supply Drivers' Union, Local 187Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George v. NemethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Stevens v. Publishers AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. American Writing MacHine Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Eggelton v. LEETESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Atiles Moréu v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API