Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Laundry & Linen Supply Drivers' Union, Local 187
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 11, 1940No. Appeal, 365PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Mr.
Justice! Steen,
The twenty-eight plaintiffs filed a hill in equity, and later an amended bill, against Laundry and Linen Supply Drivers’ Union, Local No. 187, and its officers, and also against eight steam power laundry companies in the City of Philadelphia, praying for a decree that certain provisions of a contract entered into between the union and the companies be declared illegal and void in so far as they affect plaintiffs, and for an injunction against those provisions being carried into effect. Defendants filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, which the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Alvord-Polk, Inc. v. F. Schumacher & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In Re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.