Legal Opinion
Farmers State Bank of Madelia, Inc. v. Burns
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1942No. Nos. 32,994, 32,995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Defendant city of Owatonna and intervener, New York Casualty Company, separately appeal from orders denying their respective motions for amended findings or a new trial.
In April 1939, defendant Burns, as contractor, entered into an agreement with the village of Madelia for the construction of certain street improvements. He applied to intervener, hereafter referred to as the surety, for the bond required by Mason St. 1927, § 9700, and it duly executed his performance bond as surety. By the terms of his application for the bond, Burns agreed that the surety should “be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WurtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- John E. Massengale, Trustee v. Transitron Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.