Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1966No. 39598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This appeal from a judgment presents the question of the priority of claims to funds withheld by municipalities on construction contracts as between the surety for the contractor (which performed the contractor’s obligation to pay claims for labor and materials) and a lender bank (which loaned money to the contractor to pay such claims upon a security assignment of the contractor’s right to payment upon completion of the contracts). The trial court found in favor of the bank and the surety appeals.

McHasco Electric, Inc., (the contractor) entered into construction contracts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. State National Bank of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  2. First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. In re the Receivership of United Prairie Bank, Respondent, vs. Molnau Trucking LLC, et al., Defendants, Granite Re, Inc....Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API