Legal Opinion
Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 27, 1925No. 24,908PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on an assignment of the earnings of the builder under two contracts with the county of St. Louis for the construction of public highways. Other issues involving other parties were litigated be low, but the only remaining question is one of priority as between plaintiff’s assignment and! the surety’s equity of subrogation. The county and the contractors were the original defendants, the claims of certain laborers, materialmen and Maryland Casualty Company, the surety, having been litigated on complaints in intervention. After findings and an order for judgment in favor of the surety,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Peerless Insurance Co. v. Cerny & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1961
- Marthaler MacHine & Engineering Co. v. MeyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Union State BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.