Harding v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Action to recover damages for malicious interference with plaintiff’s business. Defendants’ demurrers to the amended and supplemental complaint upon the grounds that the facts stated therein were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action were sustained. Plaintiff appeals.
The questions for decision are:(1) Whether a paid surety acting singly has the right to withdraw as surety from a bond, where it does so with malicious motives ;(2) Whether an agent is liable in tort for an act not constituting a separate tort such as assault, conversion, and the like, where the act is…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- James R. Anderson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Douglas County Dennis Nagle, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.