Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. West

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2003No. Misc. AG No. 38, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against Patti Diane Gilman West, alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The Commission charged respondent with violating Rules 1.1 (Competence),1 *3971.2 (Scope of representation),2 1.3 (Diligence),3 1.4 (Communication),4 1.16 (Declining or terminating representation),5 3.2 (Expediting litigation),6 3.3 (Candor toward the tribunal),7 *3983.4(c) and (d) (Fairness to opposing party and counsel),8 8.1(b) (Bar admission and disciplinary matters),9…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API