Legal Opinion

Croom v. . Cornelius

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The determination of the question of title to the land contracted to be conveyed involves the construction of the will of J. P. Eear-rington. The testator devised his property to his wife and to their three children (one of whom is the plaintiff) in these words: “I wish my estate of whatever nature equally divided among the aforesaid four.” By a subsequent clause tbe testator added this provision to his will: “In the event that either child die without will, I wish that child’s share to descend to his or her children (share and share alike), or if there are no surviving children to go not to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barco v. . OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Heefner v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Woody v. . CatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Hampton v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Crawley v. . StearnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Buffaloe v. BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Elder v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Morrell v. Building Management, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API