Legal Opinion

Crawley v. . Stearns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

On 26 September, 1918, Berry W. Brown and Alice E. Brown, bis wife, executed a written instrument, evidently intended as a deed of trust but designated on its face as a second mortgage, purporting to convey title to a lot in tbe city of Raleigh described as lot No. 9 on Shaffer’s map, to secure the payment at maturity of three bonds, each in the sum of $500, held by L. B. Capehart and afterwards assigned to the Mechanics and Farmers Bank. The parties named are the makers, L. B. Capehart and Allen J. Barwick, trustee. In the premises of the instrument and in the habendum Capehart is named as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Lessee of French and Wife v. SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. Bryan v. . EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Hutton & Bourbonnais, Inc. v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Weeks v. Wilkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. West Ex Rel. West v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Woody v. . CatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. DIXIELAND REALTY COMPANY v. WysorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Williams v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API