Legal Opinion

Woody v. . Cates

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The determination of the question of title presented by this appeal turns upon the construction of the following clause of the will of Josephus Younger, probated in 1902: “I give and devise to my daughter, Maria Carver, during her life and no longer, 300 acres of land (describing it). After the death of my daughter, Maria Carver, I devise the property in this paragraph named to ■ her children then living and to the issue of such of her children as may be dead, per stirpes.1'

It is admitted that Maria Carver had two children, J. G. Moore (by a former marriage) and Willie E. Carver. J. G. Moore…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Irvin v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Hobgood v. HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Watson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Beacom v. AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smyth v. . McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Chandler v. . CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. DIXIELAND REALTY COMPANY v. WysorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Lee v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API