Legal Opinion

Buffaloe v. Blalock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1950No. 457PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeNny, J".

The intent of the testator is the polar star that must guide the courts in the interpretation of a will. Elmore v. Austin, ante, 13; Cannon v. Cannon, 225 N.C. 611, 36 S.E. 2d 17; Holland v. Smith, 224 N.C. 255, 29 S.E. 2d 888. Tbis intent is to be gathered from a consideration of the will from its four corners, and sucb intent should be given effect, unless contrary to some rule of law or at variance with public policy. House v. House, 231 N.C. 218, 56 S.E. 2d 695; Williams v. Rand, 223 N.C. 734, 28 S.E. 2d 247; Culbreth v. Caison, 220 N.C. 717, 18 S.E. 2d 136; Smith v. Mears, 218…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API