Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hampton v. . West

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnhill, J.

This was a controversy without action. Plaintiff contracted to sell and defendant to buy certain real estate in Currituck County. The plaintiff tendered deed therefor and defendant refused to accept same and pay the agreed price on the ground that plaintiff is unable to convey a fee simple title to the real estate involved.

It is admitted that the land, the title to which is in controversy, passed under the will of H. D. Spear, the late husband of the plaintiff, and that the determination of the questions at issue depends upon the construction of said will which was probated 4 June, 1927.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Rees v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Patrick v. . MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Foil v. Newsome.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Voncannon v. Hudson Belk Co. of Asheboro, N. C., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Worsley v. WorsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API