Legal Opinion
The Ciano
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 1946No. 43 of 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 F.Supp. 35 (1946)
THE CIANO.
NAVARRO
v.
DOE et al.
No. 43 of 1945.
District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
December 16, 1946.
Conlen, LaBrum & Beechwood, of Philadelphia, Pa., for libellant.
Rawle & Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding in admiralty to obtain requital for damage to a shipment of paprika which was carried from Alicante, Spain, to Philadelphia, Pa., on the "S.S. Ciano."
The Sociedad Metalurgica Duro Felguera, a Spanish corporation, entered its appearance as owner and operator of the "Ciano" and it is chiefly against that company that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Niel MaerskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Stirnimann v. the San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- The CarsoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Thomas Roberts & Co. v. Calmar SS CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. HauptmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Caemint Food, Inc. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, Companhia De NavegacaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- American Tobacco Co. v. the Katingo HadjipateraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Kupfermann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- The NorteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.