Legal Opinion
Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. Hauptman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1938No. 8605PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Albers Bros. Milling Company appeals from a decree of the District Court claiming that the damages awarded it for injury to a shipment of corn in bulk on the steamship Nelson Traveler, on a voyage from the port of Brooklyn, N. Y., to the ports of San Pedro and San Franciso, Cal., are insufficient and should be increased. Sidney M. Hauptman, as trustee of the Charles Nelson Company, a corporation, claimant of the Nelson Traveler, and also as trustee of the Nelson Steamship Company, cross-appeals from the same decree, claiming the Milling Company is entitled to no damages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The Niel MaerskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- The Silver PalmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Broughton & Wiggins Nav. Co. v. Hammond Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hecht, Levis & Kahn, Inc., Libellant-Appellant v. The S. S. President Buchanan, Her Engines, Etc., and American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Thomas Roberts & Co. v. Calmar SS CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- The Chester ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Copco Steel & Engineering Company v. S/S ALWAKIDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.