Legal Opinion
Kupfermann v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 7, 1955No. Nos. 56-60, Dockets 23535-23539PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
These are five surviving libels in admiralty out of a substantial additional number brought for loss or damage to cargo by various shippers of goods consisting of rugs, wool, sheep and goatskins, gum, seeds, walnuts, etc., from the Persian Gulf to New York on the Government’s S. S. Shickshinny in March and April, 1946. Judge Murphy heard the libels as consolidated for trial and, in a reasoned opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 123 F.Supp. 99, made judicious and discriminating findings against the shippers in certain cases and in their favor in others. The shippers have not appealed, and respondent does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- The Niel MaerskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Copco Steel & Engineering Company v. S/S ALWAKIDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Karabagui v. the ShickshinnyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- The CianoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by30 opinions
- Interstate Steel Corporation v. SS" Crystal Gem"District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Hecht, Levis & Kahn, Inc., Libellant-Appellant v. The S. S. President Buchanan, Her Engines, Etc., and American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Portland Fish Company, a Corporation v. States Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.