Legal Opinion

Thomas Roberts & Co. v. Calmar SS Corporation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1945No. 45 of 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

This is a libel for cargo damage against the Calmar Steamship Corporation wherein the libellant cargo owner, Thomas Roberts & Company, has joined the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company as a respondent.

The legal status of the libellant, its ownership of the goods, the fact of the shipment and issuance to libellant of the bill of lading and certificates of insurance, the fact of damages and the amount of libellant’s net expense in reconditioning the goods are admitted by respondents by stipulation. Although there are collateral issues, there are two broad…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Globe Solvents Co. v. the CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Presley v. National Flood Insurers AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API