Legal Opinion
The Daido Line v. Thomas P. Gonzalez, Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1962No. 17286PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
The Thomas P. Gonzalez Corporation sued the Daido Line in admiralty alleging damage to a shipment of garlic. The District Court found: that the garlic was received by the carrier in good order and condition and outturned at destination badly damaged; that the carrier failed to use due care in keeping and ventilating the cargo during the voyage; that these failures proximately caused the damage to the garlic; and that no part of the damage was caused by act or omission of the shipper or inherent vice of the cargo. On an examination of the whole record we conclude that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The Niel MaerskCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Schroeder Bros., Inc., Libellants-Appellees v. The Saturnia and Italia Societa Anonima Di Navigazione, Claimant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Columbia Brick Works, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Interstate Steel Corporation v. SS" Crystal Gem"District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Compagnie De Navigation Fraissinet & Cyprien Fabre, S.A. And S. S. Allobrogia v. Mondial United Corporation, Mondial United Corporation v. S. S. Exmoor, Her Engines, Etc., and Compagnie De Navigation Fraissinet& Cyprien Fabre, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.