Legal Opinion
Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 1999No. CX-99-889PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Queen City Construction, Inc. appeals the district court’s denial of a temporary injunction preventing respondent City of Rochester from requiring successful bidders on a public construction project to sign a project labor agreement (PLA). We affirm.
FACTS
Rochester intends to make extensive improvements to the Mayo Civic Center, which it owns and operates. It plans to build a new 25,200-square-foot exhibit hall, as well as expand and renovate other parts of the center.
On January 14, 1999, Jim Ibister, the Executive Director of the Mayo Civic Center, wrote the Rochester…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. West Indian Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002