Legal Opinion

Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 5, 1989No. 88-840PublishedCited by 749 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

delivered the opinion of the Court. '

In Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 475 U. S. 608 (1986) (Golden State I), we held that the respondent city-had violated federal law by conditioning the renewal of petitioner’s taxicab franchise on settlement of a pending labor dispute between petitioner and its union. On remand, the District Court enjoined the city to reinstate the franchise but concluded that 42 U. S. C. § 1983 (1982 ed.)1 did not authorize an award of compensatory damages. The court reasoned that “the supremacy clause does not create individual rights that may be vindicated in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by749 opinions

  1. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

744 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API