Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. Higgins

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1908No. Civ. No. 506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders refusing to vacate the judgment and to amend the conclusions of law; and refusing to permit the withdrawal of a deposit made in court. Waldo M. .York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. L. Horton, J. Wiseman McDonald and Thomas P. Higgins, for Appellant.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders refusing to vacate the judgment and to amend the conclusions of law; and refusing to permit the withdrawal of a deposit made in court. Waldo M. .York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. L. Horton, J. Wiseman McDonald and Thomas P. Higgins, for Appellant. Charles L. Batcheller, Percy B. Lhoyd, Scarborough & Bowen, W. D. McConnell, Munson & Barclay, Jones & Weller, and Hutton & Williams, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Consolidated action on mechanics’ liens. Appellant Higgins is the owner of a six-story brick building erected for him in the city of Los Angeles by respondents Alpeter, Hall & Alpeter as contractors, in accordance with three separate contracts in writing, to wit: (1) One to construct a four-story building for the sum of $40,500; (2) another to furnish labor and materials for walls, roof and interior bearing partitions of two additional stories, for the sum of $4,700; and (3) the third to complete the fifth and sixth stories of the building according to the plans and specifications therefor,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mills v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. D. I. Nofziger Lumber Co. v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Steiger Terra Cotta & Pottery Works v. City of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API