Legal Opinion

Harwell, King & Co. v. Duncan Bros.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1920No. 9898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge. Action by Duncan Bros., a partnership composed of W. M. and L. L. Duncan, against Harwell, King & Company, a partnership, composed of W. C. Harwell and T, C. King, as partners, and W. O. Harwell and T. C. King, as individuals, on account. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, J.

Defendants in error, Duncan Bros., of Cyril, Okla., hereinafter styled plaintiffs, began this action against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter styled defendants, to recover the sum of $1,265.15, a balance claimed to be due on account of the consignment of 106 bales of cotton to defendants by plaintiffs.

The answer of the defendants admits that they received from the plaintiffs the said 106 bales of cotton upon which they advanced the sum of $6,500, and that there remained after the payment of said advance of $6,500 the sum of $1,265.15, and alleges that the said $1,265.15 was, on direction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Holmes v. HalstidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Citizens' Bank of Headrick v. Citizens' State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. FraserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott Auto & Supply Co. v. McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. City of Cushing v. BaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. McClelland-gentry Motor Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API