Scott Auto & Supply Co. v. McQueen

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error will be referred to herein as the defendant, and the defendant in error as plaintiff, as they appeared in the trial eonrt.

The plaintiff filed his petition in the dis-' trict court of Oklahoma county on the 2nd of April, 1821. On April 25, plaintiff filed an amended petition, on which the cause was tried. It is alleged in the amended petition, after the formal parts, that plaintiff, pursuant to a yerbal contract, delivered his Franklin automobile to the defendant company to paint and keep in storage while the process of painting was going on,…