Legal Opinion

City of Cushing v. Bay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 7, 1921No. 10179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; John P. Hickam, Judge. Action by A. A. Bay against the City of Cushing for damages resulting from pollution of stream. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Payne county, Oklahoma, by A. A. Bay, as plaintiff, against the city of Cushing, as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the pollution of Cottonwood creek, which flows across an 80-acre tract of land belonging to plaintiff and situated southeast of the city of Cushing; the alleged pollution being caused by the overflow of the city’s septic tank into said creek. Judgment was recovered against the defendant, to reverse which this appeal is prosecuted.

The defendant insists that the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oil Fields & Santa Fe R. Co. v. Treese Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. Atlas Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Harwell, King & Co. v. Duncan Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Martin v. McCuneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Livingston Oil Corp. v. SheftsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Thompson v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API