Legal Opinion

McClelland-gentry Motor Co. v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 12315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by.

PINKHAM; C.

This was an action instituted by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, in -the district court of Tulsa county, Okla. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff alleged in his petition' that on or about the first day of May, 1920, he placed in the possession of defendant one certain Hudson automobile, with the oral agreement and understanding that the same should be repaired and made to operate in a satisfactory manner, and that a defective condition in the engine or motor thereof should be remedied and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poos v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Harwell, King & Co. v. Duncan Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spencer v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API