Oregon & Western Colonization Co. v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
As appears from the statement, the principal question for decision is upon the validity of the promise of the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the amount of the scaledown of the mortgage indebtedness to Summit Investment Company, namely the sum of $3,879.55, which is included in the note dated July 6, 1934. It is the contention of the defendants that the note and mortgage are, to that extent, void and unenforceable, being against public policy and the spirit and purpose of the federal legislation which made it possible for the defendants to refinance the real estate mortgage.
The loan to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Anderson v. Horst Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Kniefel v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cardona v. Corte de Distrito de HumacaoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- Robinson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- May v. WhitbeckMontana Supreme Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.