Legal Opinion

Igbinovia v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1995No. 24071, 24312 and 24202PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*701OPINION

By the Court,

Shearing, J.:

These consolidated appeals require us to decide whether district court judges possess the statutory authority to order a person convicted of violating the narcotics laws of this state to reimburse the arresting authorities for the outlay of “buy money,” the funds expended by police departments to obtain conclusive evidence of an offender’s guilt, either by imposing the requirement as part of the sentence or as a condition of probation.

We hold that the restitution portion of the sentencing statute does not accord the authority to order restitution of “buy…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. GibbensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Sean Meacham (93-1692) and Ramone Botello (93-1768)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. James DaddatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State of Iowa v. Darryl B. Shears Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Hewitt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Roe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SequeiraHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API