Dinwiddie v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
This was an action for partition of real estate, brought by appellants against appellees.
The complaint alleges that appellants and appellee, William A. Smith, are the owners, as tenants in common, of the real estate described in the complaint. To this complaint appellees filed a general denial, and appellee, William A. Smith, filed a second and third paragraph of separate answer. To said paragraphs of separate answer appellants demurred for want of facts, which demurrer was overruled. Appellee Smith filed his cross-complaint against appellants, in which he alleged he was the sole owner of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. DinwiddieIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Smiley v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lynch v. LeursIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- Osborne v. EslingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Stout v. RaylIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Newman v. FidlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912