Legal Opinion

Stout v. Rayl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1896No. 18,087PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The errors assigned on this appeal call in question the conclusions of law stated on the special finding of facts by the circuit court, and the action of that court in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The substance of the special finding is as follows:

1st. That Robert Stout died intestate on June 18, 1895, leaving surviving him as his only heirs at law the defendant, Jemima Stout, his widow, Lucius Stout, Mary Ann Allen and Andrew P. Stout, his children.

2d. That on the 22d day of October, 1881, Robert Stout, by warranty deed, his wife, Jemima, joining therein, conveyed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CarricoIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Owen v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Squires v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Stewart v. WeedIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Smiley v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cribbs v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Musser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Guthrie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Osborne v. EslingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Blochowitz v. BlochowitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API