Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Dinwiddie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1894No. 17,226PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellees filed their complaint in two paragraphs, in each of which they alleged that, as sole heirs at law of Maria Dinwiddie, deceased, they were the owners in fee simple as tenants in common of certain described real estate, praying that their title be quieted and for partition.

To this complaint the appellants answered jointly in two paragraphs, and the board of commissioners also separately in two paragraphs. In each paragraph of both answers was set up.a copy of the last will of the said Maria Dinwiddie, under the terms and provisions of which it was averred that the appellant, board…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Grimes' Executors v. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Kinney v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Skinner v. Harrison TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Craig v. SecristIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Joint County Park Board v. StegemollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dykeman v. JenkinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Barr, Trustee v. Geary, AuditorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API