Legal Opinion

McDonald, Admr. v. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1932No. 23580PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The oral argument and briefs of counsel have covered a wide scope, but a consideration of the statutes applicable to the facts presented by the record accomplishes a complete disposition of the issues involved.

Section 710-165, General Code, provides as follows: “No property or securities received or held by any trust company in trust shall be mingled with the investments of the capital stock or other properties belonging to such trust company or be liable for its debts or obligations. Moneys -pending distribution or investment may be treated as a deposit in the trust department, or may be…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BinderOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Squire v. BrancifortiOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Robinson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API