In Re Estate of Binder
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
For convenience, in the course of this opinion, the Superintendent of Banks in charge of liquidation of The Guardian Trust Company will be designated as the superintendent and The Guardian Trust Company as the bank.
The Probate Court, in sustaining the exceptions to the accounts of the trustee and of the superintendent, assumed to find not only that the investments in question were unauthorized and void and that the trustee bank should be surcharged with the amount invested in the land trust certificates, but went further and ordered the -superintendent to issue to the successor trustee a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- White v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Estate of SwiecickiIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- National City Bank v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. EatonOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of WemyssCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hutchings v. Louisville Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.