Legal Opinion
MacIa v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 21, 2001No. 2:00-CV-299PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
In this case asserting trademark infringement and unfair competition claims under the Lanham Act and related state law, Defendant Intuit, Inc. (“Intuit”) has moved to dismiss the counts asserted against it for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, Intuit’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are derived from the Amended Complaint and taken as true for purposes of this motion to dismiss. Plaintiff Harland A. Macia, III, doing business as Catamount…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cross-Appellant v. mcneil-p.p.c., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Nabisco, Inc. And Nabisco Brands Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants v. Warner-Lambert Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wharton v. Tri-State Drilling & BoringSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Omega S.A. v. Omega Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Combe Inc. v. Dr. Aug. Wolff GmbH & Co. KG ArzneimittelDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Klumba.ua, LLC v. Klumba.comDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.