Legal Opinion

Combe Inc. v. Dr. Aug. Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 28, 2018No. Case No. 1:17–cv–935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge

Defendant, a German manufacturer of medicinal, cosmetic and dermatological products, filed an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office ("PTO") Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") to register the mark VAGISAN for use on pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations in the United States. Plaintiff, a domestic manufacturer of competing products sold under the registered mark VAGISIL, filed an opposition to defendant's application. The TTAB ultimately ruled in favor of defendant, finding there was no likelihood of confusion between…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Combe Inc. v. Dr. Aug. Wolff GMBH & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  2. Brothers of the Wheel M.C. Executive Council, Inc. v. MollohanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  3. Long v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. The Talaria Company, LLC v. DuplessieDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API