Wharton v. Tri-State Drilling & Boring
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Appellant TriState Drilling & Boring admits to having mistakenly drilled a well on the property of appellees Clyde and Vivian Wharton and filed a fraudulent mechanics’ lien against the Whartons’ property in an effort to compel the Whartons to negotiate an easement. The trial court found Tri-State hable for abuse of process and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. Tri-State appeals the trial court’s denial of Tri-State’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and award of actual and punitive damages to the Whartons. Although we find that TriState’s actions in this case did…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Sherman v. Champlain Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1858
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. Ormond Bushey & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Sullivan v. James R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Drake ex rel. J.D. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- Ian Baron v. Molly McGintySupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.