Legal Opinion

Wharton v. Tri-State Drilling & Boring

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 19, 2003No. 01-520PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Appellant TriState Drilling & Boring admits to having mistakenly drilled a well on the property of appellees Clyde and Vivian Wharton and filed a fraudulent mechanics’ lien against the Whartons’ property in an effort to compel the Whartons to negotiate an easement. The trial court found Tri-State hable for abuse of process and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. Tri-State appeals the trial court’s denial of Tri-State’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and award of actual and punitive damages to the Whartons. Although we find that TriState’s actions in this case did…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Sherman v. Champlain Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1858

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fly Fish Vermont, Inc. v. Chapin Hill Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. Ormond Bushey & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Sullivan v. James R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Drake ex rel. J.D. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2015
  5. Ian Baron v. Molly McGintySupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API