Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McArthur v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1946No. L. A. 19568PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks reinstatement as an attorney at law. The Board of Governors of The State Bar, by unanimous vote of the 13 members present and voting, declined to recommend reinstatement. After consideration of the entire record we have concluded, for the reasons hereinafter stated, that petitioner has failed to establish that he has attained such degree of rehabilitation as would justify us in reinstating him.

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law in Illinois in 1916 and in California in 1920, and on June 12, 1933, upon recommendation of the Board of Governors he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kepler v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re AndreaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Preston v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wettlin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Roth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Beeks v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API